[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IMP-dev] minor patch

I think the best answer that had come up when Keren and I talked about this was to add a virtual method get_restrained_particles which returns the internal particles list by default, but could return something else in the case of restraint sets or nonbonded lists or such.
We also may want to thing about making the restraints simpler (and setup more complicated), by, for example, making the chain restraints only handle one chain. Currently they introduce fake connections between multiple chains. 


On May 9, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Keren Lasker wrote:


yes - since we need to iterate over the list of restraints.
On May 9, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Friedrich Foerster wrote:


lude/IMP/Restraint.h	(revision 539)
+++ kernel/include/IMP/Restraint.h	(working copy)
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@
    return model_.get();
  }

-  IMP_LIST(protected, Particle, particle, Particle*)
+  //IMP_LIST(protected, Particle, particle, Particle*)
+  IMP_LIST(public, Particle, particle, Particle*)

private:
  internal::ObjectPointer<Model, false> model_;


_______________________________________________
IMP-dev mailing list

https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev