[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [modeller_usage] Restraints



On 4/7/10 7:42 AM, Offord, Victoria wrote:
I am really hoping that I am not asking a dumb question but I cannot
seem to get the restraints to work on my protein. To try and get to
grips with this I am using a target-template sequence identity of 100%.
I have set the secondary structure as is in the known structure but
cannot seem to ‘force’ the restraints through onto the target.
I see only one problem with your script itself, and that should be 
unrelated: special_restraints() is called *after* the system topology is 
set up, so patching the topology will have no affect there. To add your 
disulfide bridges, add those calls to patch() to the special_patches() 
method instead.
Note that restraints created in special_restraints() are *added* to the 
list of all restraints; they don't replace existing restraints. So, if 
there is a conflict between your restraints and the default set of 
restraints, Modeller will not be able to satisfy them. In your case, 
this effect will actually be at its most pronounced, because you have a 
100% identical template, so the template-derived restraints will be 
extremely strong. Secondary structure restraints are rather weak, so 
they're only likely to work in regions of the structure where you have 
low sequence identity (or no template at all).
	Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
--
modeller-care@salilab.org             http://www.salilab.org/modeller/
Modeller mail list: http://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/modeller_usage