Subject: Re: [modeller_usage] high model clashscore
From: Nick Burton <>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:17:33 +0000
Hello,
I have found that, in many cases, switching on the Lennard-Jones restraint
(energy_data.dynamic_lennard = True) and up-weighting it with respect to
other restraints (env.schedule_scale...) can reduce the bad van der Waal's
interactions as measured by Molprobity.
Cheers,
Nick
On 20 November 2010 13:03, Anton Iershov <"
target="_blank">> wrote:
Dear Modeller Caretaker,
When performing homology modeling with default parameters
("model-default.py") and subsequent analysis with Molprobity
(http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/) I obtain models with much more high
clashscore than the template has, and model optimization does not help much.
Then, Kinemage (http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu) shows a lot of "bad"
van der Waals contacts.
What should I do to obtain model of higher quality (I mean to reduce
clashscore and number of "bad" contacts)?
Thanks in advance,
Anton.
----------------------
Dr N M Burton
Department of Biochemistry
University of Bristol
BS8 1TD, UK
+44 117 3312149