[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[modeller_usage] DOPE vs molpdf



Dear Modeller creators and users,

I wonder, which of the scoring functions available in Modeller is preferable to choose best models.
A similar question was answered back in 2006: 
https://salilab.org/archives/modeller_usage/2006/msg00214.html
but it was related to very different use case (template of very low 
identity), and the answer omits the relation to molpdf. The modeller 
documentation on DOPE score and the 2006 DOPE paper say, that it was 
designed to choose the best model. However, this value is not printed 
out by default neither appear in the detailed evaluation of local model 
problems presented in the tables of restraints violations.
The fact that molpdf only is selected as the default score of model 
quality makes DOPE at little suspicious. I mean, it looks like there was 
a reason to hide it. In my case, my models are good enough to all have 
GA341 scores equal to 1, what makes this value useless. Still, molpdf 
and DOPE do not correlate, so which one shall I consider more important 
for model choice?
I see from my experience that molpdf is rather sensitive to the choice 
of templates (e.g. the same protein template from X-ray vs NMR can give 
very different molpdf values of models, with much more restraint 
violations for NMR). Also, if one is using multiple templates for the 
same sequence, the molpdf values are closer to ones obtained using 
single worst template than to using the best one, while DOPE values do 
not change much. These observations would count against relying on 
molpdf, but if molpdf is misleading, then the entire verbose analysis of 
restraint violations from which molpdf is calculated must be equally 
misleading.
Could you share your insight and comments?

With regards,

Paweł Kędzierski

begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Pawe=C5=82 K=C4=99dzierski
n;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:K=C4=99dzierski;Pawe=C5=82
org;quoted-printable:Wroc=C5=82aw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry;Advanced Materials Engineering and Modelling Group
adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Wyb. Wyspia=C5=84skiego 27;;Politechnika Wroc=C5=82awska, Wydzia=C5=82 Chemiczny;Wroc=C5=82aw;dolno=C5=9Bl=C4=85skie;50-370;Poland
email;internet:Pawel.Kedzierski@pwr.edu.pl
tel;work:+48 71 3203200
tel;fax:+48 71 3203364
version:2.1
end:vcard