Hi all, thanks for the discussion today! Here's the slides I showed: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-70W4jeSS4FU8CQpYfRDng06PucfpKRW/edi...
Jeff will look into getting a Slack set up with a premium subscription and we can continue refining the terminology as we go.
I have a shared google drive set up through the RCSB google organization, but unfortunately I can't seem to invite people with non-gmail e-mails - if anyone knows a workaround let me know!
- Jared
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 3:26 PM Jared Sagendorf jared.sagendorf@rcsb.org wrote:
> Sure Jeff, pushing it forward two hours to 12:00 PST should work for most > of us. Hopefully that makes it easier for you! I'll update the calendar > event on our side. > > Congrats on the R24! > > See you Friday, > > - Jared > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:20 PM Hoch,Jeffrey hoch@uchc.edu wrote: > >> Hi Jared – met too! I added a term to the dictionary . Yulia, Michael >> and I will be driving back from a Gordon Conference in Vermont Friday >> morning, and it might be tight for us to make the schedule time. I know >> there are many schedules to check, but would it be possible to bump the >> time back a couple of hours to take some of the stress out? -Jeff >> >> >> >> PS – good news is that we heard BMRB will be funded via an R24 mechanism. >> Don’t know the budget yet, though. >> >> >> >> *From: *Jared Sagendorf jared.sagendorf@rcsb.org >> *Date: *Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 2:08 PM >> *To: *"Hoch,Jeffrey" hoch@uchc.edu >> *Subject: *Next meeting agenda >> >> >> >> *** Attention: This is an external email. Use caution responding, opening >> attachments or clicking on links. *** >> >> Hi Jeff, looking forward to the next meeting! >> >> For the agenda this week, I was thinking we could start with having a >> look at some of the terminology, now that we have a dictionary in place. >> I'll put together a few slides that I hope will explain the way the Sali >> group speaks about modeling, and we can identify if there's any >> inconsistencies between the two groups. >> >> Aside from that, I thought it would be good to begin a discussion on what >> the current hurdles are to actually implementing a fully Bayesian >> validation pipeline for the PDB. What are the unsolved problems or >> unimplemented steps that are missing to actually push this forward, and >> could we work together to start solving those issues? >> >> Also happy to send out any items you would like to bring up! >> >> >> >> - Jared >> >