28 May
2008
28 May
'08
12:40 p.m.
> >> In fact, the "Particle::set_is_active" method should probably go >> away. > > Sure - if we're going to allow particle deletion, there's no reason to > have active/inactive. >
We might need it for discrete optimization via MC or inference. I would prefer if you'll leave it till we sort out the discrete optimization framework.