changing name to "results" might not be a bad solution :) As long as we get an indication about completely new failures that's good (I would actually put those in the subject line)--On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Russel <drussel@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Barak Raveh <barak.raveh@gmail.com> wrote:Number of failed tests sounds like a great idea to me. Still, it is problematic that we get a "failure" notice every morning when all we have are known issues, it means that nobody cares what's in those tests anymore.I would simply change the email title to "results" :-) Given that there are a bunch of separate modules in there maintained by different people, I don't think it makes sense to aim for a state where a single bit provides useful information about all of IMP.
Barak