16 Jan
2009
16 Jan
'09
12:20 p.m.
Daniel Russel wrote: > I had mentioned this a while ago and would like to bring it up again > since now seems like a good time to deal with it: I would like to remove > the particle storage in the Restraint base class.
Sounds reasonable to me. But why not go further and port existing restraints not by using the IMP_LIST macros but by giving them containers? Do you see any need for a restraint containing a particle list that a container would not fulfill?
Ben
--
ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle