On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Ben Webb wrote:
> Daniel Russel wrote: >> O(N) is not is irrelevant. The constants are what matters and they >> were bad. The code I submitted is better, but still not as fast as >> the >> CGAL one. > > I must be misunderstanding your benchmark, in that case. Typo. I meant "O(N) or not is irrelevant" as the constants are what really matters. But yes, as I mentioned before, supporting different sized particles makes it not O(N) as there is a term to handle the spread in radii.
> Nope, the other way around: anything can be linked to LGPL. We still > have to respect the licenses of our dependencies. LGPL is what I > proposed for IMP, but Andrej has not yet made a decision on this > score. > I proposed LGPL so that others could write their own extension modules > and not be forced to make them open source. Yes and anything can be linked against QPL, from my understanding, so I don't see the problem. What am I missing?