> I like the name, but unfortunately it would complicate the Python > interface. If someone says "import math" in an IMP Python module they > won't get the standard Python math library - they'll get IMP.math. This > is because Python by default does a relative import before an absolute > import. Fortunately they realized that this is a bad idea, so the > default has changed in Python 3.0 (and can be imported from __future__ > in Python 2.6). But obviously we can't require everybody use Python 2.6 > or 3.0. It's not impossible to import the standard math module from IMP, > but it is very awkward - see the workaround to import modeller from > IMP.modeller. This additional complication is why I prefer algebra to math. > Either way, but lets get something in there.