Daniel Russel wrote: > On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Ben Webb wrote: >> Daniel Russel wrote: >>> I would suggest having one header in each module called basic.h or >>> base_types.h or something similar which does the job of base_types.h >>> in IMP and defines the export and namespace macros. >> 'base_types.h' seems a little odd since neither the export nor the >> namespace macros are types. That header is actually doing the job of >> IMP_config.h, so we could call it config.h, but I don't know if >> that's a >> huge improvement over the current name. > The IMP_ in IMP_config.h always seemed redundant.
I agree - it was really only there because we were a bit sloppy about include paths at the time. It shouldn't be necessary any more.
> Agreed. "config.h" sounds good as it is nice and general and can > handle all basic setup stuff.
Very well - I will rename accordingly.
Ben