This patch needs the following added to the appropriate place to not break memory management.
+ %pythonprepend Particle::Particle %{ + if len(args) >0: self.thisown=False + %}
Probably got lost somewhere in the patch process.
On Jan 5, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Notification of IMP commits wrote:
> Author: ben@SALILAB.ORG > Date: 2009-01-05 11:43:25 -0800 (Mon, 05 Jan 2009) > New Revision: 1102 > > Removed: > trunk/kernel/doc/patch/particle_model.patch > trunk/kernel/doc/patch/particle_model.readme > Modified: > trunk/kernel/include/Particle.h > trunk/kernel/pyext/IMP/test.py > trunk/kernel/src/Particle.cpp > trunk/kernel/test/particles/test_refcount.py > Log: > Patch from Daniel, with minor cleanup by me: add a constructor to > Particle to > take a Model, and change a few tests to use this constructor. > > > Modified: trunk/kernel/include/Particle.h > =================================================================== > --- trunk/kernel/include/Particle.h 2008-12-31 00:40:19 UTC (rev 1101) > +++ trunk/kernel/include/Particle.h 2009-01-05 19:43:25 UTC (rev 1102) > @@ -96,8 +96,9 @@ > > public: > > + //! Construct a particle and add it to the Model > + Particle(Model *m); > > - > Particle(); > ~Particle(); > > > Modified: trunk/kernel/pyext/IMP/test.py > =================================================================== > --- trunk/kernel/pyext/IMP/test.py 2008-12-31 00:40:19 UTC (rev 1101) > +++ trunk/kernel/pyext/IMP/test.py 2009-01-05 19:43:25 UTC (rev 1102) > @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ > def create_point_particle(self, model, x, y, z): > """Make a particle with optimizable x, y and z attributes, and > add it to the model.""" > - p = IMP.Particle() > - model.add_particle(p) > + p = IMP.Particle(model) > p.add_attribute(IMP.FloatKey("x"), x, True) > p.add_attribute(IMP.FloatKey("y"), y, True) > p.add_attribute(IMP.FloatKey("z"), z, True) > > Modified: trunk/kernel/src/Particle.cpp > =================================================================== > --- trunk/kernel/src/Particle.cpp 2008-12-31 00:40:19 UTC (rev 1101) > +++ trunk/kernel/src/Particle.cpp 2009-01-05 19:43:25 UTC (rev 1102) > @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@ > > IMP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE > > +Particle::Particle(Model *m) > +{ > + is_active_ = true; > + m->add_particle(this); > +} > + > + > Particle::Particle() > { > is_active_ = true; > > Modified: trunk/kernel/test/particles/test_refcount.py > =================================================================== > --- trunk/kernel/test/particles/test_refcount.py 2008-12-31 00:40:19 > UTC (rev 1101) > +++ trunk/kernel/test/particles/test_refcount.py 2009-01-05 19:43:25 > UTC (rev 1102) > @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ > self._check_number(0) > > m= IMP.Model() > - p= IMP.Particle() > - m.add_particle(p) > + p= IMP.Particle(m) > self._check_number(1) > > p=1 > @@ -47,8 +46,8 @@ > """Check that ref counting works with removing particles""" > self._check_number(0) > m= IMP.Model() > - p= IMP.Particle() > - pi= m.add_particle(p) > + p= IMP.Particle(m) > + pi= p.get_index() > self._check_number(1) > m.remove_particle(pi) > self._check_number(1) > @@ -86,10 +85,10 @@ > self._check_number(0) > m= IMP.Model() > print 7 > - p= IMP.Particle() > + p= IMP.Particle(m) > print p > print 8 > - pi= m.add_particle(p) > + pi= p.get_index() > print 9 > p=None > self._check_number(1) > @@ -141,8 +140,8 @@ > """Check that removed particles are skipped""" > print "skipped" > m= IMP.Model() > - p= IMP.Particle() > - pi= m.add_particle(p) > + p= IMP.Particle(m) > + pi= p.get_index() > ps= m.get_particles() > self.assertEqual(len(ps), 1, "Should only be 1 particle") > m.remove_particle(pi) > > _______________________________________________ > IMP-commits mailing list > IMP-commits@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-commits