> > I don't agree. There is no way that we can do sufficient testing of the > > code itself, packaging, documentation etc. etc. to warrant making this > > our primary distribution channel. > It currently is our primary distribution channel currently
Right, and that isn't a long term solution. An untested, always sort-of-broken nightly build cheapens the whole product. People expect to see well tested stable builds from time to time.
> I suspect that if we are going to make releases work we need to have > them every 6 months or so
Yes, that's what we already committed ourselves to.
Ben