8 Oct
2009
8 Oct
'09
9:52 p.m.
On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel wrote:
> > > 2009/10/8 Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Dina Schneidman wrote: > > yes! another good point, changes affect others! especially when the > logic is changed... > > Definitely. Although in this case there was no previously specified > logic... > > I disagree. The point was raised many times and never discussed. That is what I mean: while it came up, we never specified a solution (and never implemented one). The docs for the read pdb function only talked about the lower parts of the hierarchy and left the details we are currently discussing unspecified.