changing name to "results" might not be a bad solution :) As long as we get an indication about completely new failures that's good (I would actually put those in the subject line)
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Barak Raveh barak.raveh@gmail.comwrote: > >> Number of failed tests sounds like a great idea to me. Still, it is >> problematic that we get a "failure" notice every morning when all we have >> are known issues, it means that nobody cares what's in those tests anymore. > > I would simply change the email title to "results" :-) Given that there > are a bunch of separate modules in there maintained by different people, I > don't think it makes sense to aim for a state where a single bit provides > useful information about all of IMP. > >