9 Oct
2009
9 Oct
'09
4:23 p.m.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Ben Webb wrote:
> On 10/09/2009 03:58 PM, Daniel Russel wrote: >> To address this, I propose: >> - provide IMP_implementation_check and IMP_usage_check macros >> - provide a methods to turn on and off the two different types of >> checks >> independently >> - remove the concept of check levels > > Sounds reasonable to me. The only problem I have with it is that > IMP_implementation_check is kind of long to type, and easy to > misspell (as you in fact have already demonstrated later in your > email!) Agreed, anything shorter to suggest that gets the point across? Not that short would prevent me from misspelling it.
"internal" probably would do.