Daniel Russel wrote: >> How does this differ from what we talked about last week? If it's the >> same, then the same deal applies: I'm waiting on the scons guys to >> resolve some build issues before making any big changes. > Nope, same thing. I figured the rearrangement meant stuff had been > resolved and something had just gotten lost along the way :-)
You have your wish as of r519.
> When I am trying things out, I don't want to put things into the IMP > svn, change the scons setup and whatever other things are necessary to > use the existing build system. I think the best thing to do is to make > another project and then include/link against imp. Eventually I hope > other people will want to do the same :-)
I agree, and that's exactly how Keren's impEM stuff currently works. But they won't do that unless they have examples. ;)
Ben