14 May
2009
14 May
'09
4:43 p.m.
I thought it was already established :)
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com wrote: > Should we establish an explicit rule in IMP that all distances are in > angstroms? The range of scales is small enough that we don't have accuracy > issues for doing this. In addition, we then don't have to worry about some > things being in nanometers (since we have no way of tagging things with > units). > > Ben already established a convention of having units if kCal/MolAngstrom for > derivative quantities. So angstroms fits with that. > > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev > >