wouldn't it be easier to have transform function after all? :)
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Daniel Russeldrussel@gmail.com wrote: > Side effect of enforcing that IMP::Objects aren't allocated on the stack > (since they are ref counted). > > > On Aug 6, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Keren Lasker wrote: > >> Daniel - >> why is it better using: >> IMP_NEW(core::Transform, tsm,(t)); >> for(Particles::iterator it = ps.begin(); it != ps.end();it++) { >> tsm->apply(*it); >> } >> instead of: >> std::for_each(ps.begin(),ps.end(),SingletonFunctor(new >> IMP::core::Transform(t))); >> >> I saw you changed it in domino . >> >> thanks, >> Keren. >> _______________________________________________ >> IMP-dev mailing list >> IMP-dev@salilab.org >> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev >