time to sleep :) lets continue in IMP meeting
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Javier Ángel Velázquez Muriel wrote: > > > 2009/10/8 Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com >> >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Dina Schneidman wrote: >> >>> yes! another good point, changes affect others! especially when the >>> logic is changed... >>> >> Definitely. Although in this case there was no previously specified >> logic... > > I disagree. The point was raised many times and never discussed. > > That is what I mean: while it came up, we never specified a solution (and > never implemented one). The docs for the read pdb function only talked about > the lower parts of the hierarchy and left the details we are currently > discussing unspecified. > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev > >