11 Jan
2008
11 Jan
'08
12:55 p.m.
Daniel Russel wrote: > It probably better to call it UnaryFunction rather than UnaryFunctor as > unary functors already mean something more general in C++ (any functor > that takes one variable). I guess strictly speaking it should be > UnaryRealFunction, but we can get elide the Real.
Fair enough; as of r319 they are UnaryFunctions.
Ben
--
ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle