28 Feb
2008
28 Feb
'08
6:59 a.m.
Daniel Russel wrote: >> Fair enough. The patch looks OK to me, although I wonder why you >> didn't >> use the perfectly good InactiveParticleException for people trying to >> touch inactive particles, rather than ValueException... > When did that get added? :-)
See: svn log -r371 https://svn.salilab.org/imp/trunk/kernel/include/IMP/log.h
Ben
--
ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle