I should add, until we move to git or something where people start using development branches more...<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Russel <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:drussel@gmail.com" target="_blank">drussel@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Barak Raveh <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:barak.raveh@gmail.com" target="_blank">barak.raveh@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Number of failed tests sounds like a great idea to me. Still, it is problematic that we get a &quot;failure&quot; notice every morning when all we 
have are known issues, it means that nobody cares what&#39;s in those tests 
anymore.</blockquote></div><div>I would simply change the email title to &quot;results&quot; :-) Given that there are a bunch of separate modules in there maintained by different people, I don&#39;t think it makes sense to aim for a state where a single bit provides useful information about all of IMP. <br>

 </div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>