I am cool with moving to git too. I played with it a little ever since Daniel's demo. It does come with some "headaches" that are avoided in svn (instead of just committing - first stage, then commit locally, then push). But it will probably be fine with everybody after some getting used to.

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Dina Schneidman <duhovka@gmail.com> wrote:
I think it is a good idea if we all use the same repository to
eliminate the need to sync svn and git.
I am sure we can all easily learn git basics fast.

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Ben Webb <ben@salilab.org> wrote:
> On 8/6/12 1:54 PM, Barak Raveh wrote:
>>
>> About git - it's kinda in the twilight zone now, Daniel already has set
>> a git repository that he keeps in sync with the svn every once in a
>> while, but it might take a little while until we leave svn, probably
>> only following the next release? Daniel? Ben?
>
>
> When we last discussed this, the tentative plan was to move to git after the
> next stable IMP release. If people have strong opinions either way about
> this, now would be the time to say so! (If you have no experience with git
> but are interested in playing with it, you could try out git-svn, which
> works quite nicely as a 'frontend' to IMP's current SVN repository.)
>
>         Ben
> --
> ben@salilab.org                      http://salilab.org/~ben/
> "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
>         - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMP-dev mailing list
> IMP-dev@salilab.org
> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
_______________________________________________
IMP-dev mailing list
IMP-dev@salilab.org
https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev



--
Barak