16 Jan
2009
16 Jan
'09
12:25 p.m.
Ben Webb wrote: > Daniel Russel wrote: >> I had mentioned this a while ago and would like to bring it up again >> since now seems like a good time to deal with it: I would like to >> remove the particle storage in the Restraint base class. > > Sounds reasonable to me. But why not go further and port existing > restraints not by using the IMP_LIST macros but by giving them > containers? Do you see any need for a restraint containing a particle > list that a container would not fulfill? No particular reason, just more work and requires actual interface changes. I'd be for it in general though.