Re: [IMP-dev] 2D geometry

2008/11/12 Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com: > Or vector and matrix can be replaced by a single version templated on the > dimension. We definitely don't want separate code bases for the 2 and 3D > versions as it will be a pain to keep the set of operations in sync. > > On Nov 12, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Keren Lasker wrote: > >> Javi, >> >> For your 2D geometry classes (Vector2D, Matrix2D ...) - why not just >> using the corresponding 3D classes and keeping Z fixed? >> I think it is not too bad in performance and will save you a lot of >> coding/debugging time. >> >> Keren. >> _______________________________________________ >> IMP-dev mailing list >> IMP-dev@salilab.org >> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev > >