22 Dec
2008
22 Dec
'08
1:51 p.m.
Daniel Russel wrote: > Since every call of p=IMP.Particle() is immediately followed by > m.add_particle(p) (and at this point there is no way to make it so that > a particle could be in multiple models) I'd suggest that we add a > constructor of Particle that takes a model allowing everyone to save a > line here and there.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Ben
--
ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle