I also agree with the idea of shortening the names. It would make our life easier
Daniel Russel wrote: > The names of some of the decorators (eg > IMP.atom.MolecularHierarchyDecorator) are rather annoyingly long. For > example > mh= IMP.atom.MolecularHierarchyDecorator.create(p, > IMP.atom.MolecularHierarchyDecorator.PROTEIN) > One uniform way of shortening them would be to just drop the decorator > bit. On the documentation side, it works since I had already > established the shorthand of saying XYZ particle instead of > XYZDecorator instance particle. Such a change would just require > running a sed script on people's code, so the cost of the update would > be small. Thoughts? The new names would include: > XYZ > XYZR > Residue > Atom > MolecularHierarchy: still kind of long, since it is now in atom we > could drop the Molecular part and just make it IMP.atom.Hierarchy, but > this causes problems if you do using or import on IMP.atom and > IMP.core (as I tend to do) > RigidBody > > Thoughts, comments? > > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev