25 May
2008
25 May
'08
4:09 p.m.
Daniel Russel wrote: > Ahh, the usual issue with boost pointer now wanting the full definition. > Here is a patch:
Indeed - I was just too lazy to fix it for you. ;) The patch did the trick.
> Also, this patch modifies the scons check for boost so it prints out the > patch if it adds something to the search path when looking for boost.
It should do that already. Your patch changes the code after the for loop, which is only called in the failure case (if no directory contained the header). So printing 'dir' there doesn't seem to make any sense (since it'll always be the last directory in the list, which we know for sure *doesn't* contain Boost, since the check inside the loop would have caught that).
Ben
--
ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle