Just set the radii to 0 or use a dummy radii value for the radii field (we could easily enough set the radius key to FloatKey to mean ignore the radius).
On Mar 25, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Ben Webb wrote:
> Daniel Russel wrote: >> Does it makes sense to have sphere and non-sphere versions of >> nonbonded lists (ones with and without non-zero radii)? I know there >> are contexts where you can get away with the latter, but it seems >> like >> we mostly want spheres and the added confusion and maintenance burden >> might overwhelm the advantage. Thoughts? I don't see myself using the >> non-sphere version. > > How would you propose implementing electrostatics, implicit solvation, > statistical potentials, etc. with the sphere-based list? None of these > have particle radii. > > Ben > -- > ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/ > "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." > - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev