It seems to me it should be PairRestraint and take a PairScore. Right? Currently I have issues if I want to apply it to two spheres.
Daniel Russel wrote: > It seems to me it should be PairRestraint and take a PairScore. Right? > Currently I have issues if I want to apply it to two spheres.
Yes, that would certainly be more general.
Ben
Actually, I'll check in a PairListRestraint in a sec when I can get swig to behave.
On Feb 19, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Ben Webb wrote:
> Daniel Russel wrote: >> It seems to me it should be PairRestraint and take a PairScore. >> Right? >> Currently I have issues if I want to apply it to two spheres. > > Yes, that would certainly be more general. > > Ben > -- > ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/ > "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." > - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
Daniel Russel wrote: > Actually, I'll check in a PairListRestraint in a sec when I can get > swig to behave.
If you want to do that, I propose subsequently renaming ListRestraint to SingletonListRestraint and ChainTripletRestraint to TripletListRestraint, since it'll get confusing otherwise. (Probably quicker for me to do this myself than to force you to write a patch for it though.)
Ben
participants (2)
-
Ben Webb -
Daniel Russel