Ok so in theory the trunk should always be stable?
Bryn
Sent from my iPod
On 21/01/2011, at 21:04, Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com wrote:
I would recommend updating to svn head (check out svn.salilab.org/imp/trunk). We probably should remove mentions of the stable branch from the manual (or figure out a better scheme for updating it). --Daniel
On Jan 21, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Robert Brynmor Fenwick wrote:
OK, I have managed to get the code to compile by removing the use of the cgal, I have however found another error that seems to be a problem with the saxs module:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "foxs_sax_fitting_6.py", line 39, in <module> IMP.core.XYZR(particles[i]).set_radius(radius) File "/Users/fenwick/opt/imp_stable/lib/python2.5/site-packages/IMP/core/__init__.py", line 579, in set_radius def set_radius(self, *args): return _IMP_core.XYZR_set_radius(self, *args) _IMP.UsageException: Cannot set value "radius" from particle Atom N as it is not there.
On 21 January 2011 18:40, Ben Webb ben@salilab.org wrote:
> On 1/21/11 9:35 AM, Daniel Russel wrote: > > My guess is that you checked things in between my checking in patches > > last night and found IMP in an inconsistent state. > > No, this is the stable branch. It's from the last time the nightly build > succeeded, which was in late October. It won't be in an inconsistent state. > > Ben > -- > ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/ > "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." > - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle > _______________________________________________ > IMP-users mailing list > IMP-users@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-users >