13 Jan
2011
13 Jan
'11
10:11 a.m.
On 1/13/11 9:33 AM, Daniel Russel wrote: > IMP_WARN doesn't have the conditional aspect of IMP_USAGE_CHECK.
Well yes, this is true. Apologies if this was not clear.
> There are some issues with the current approach as it makes it hard > to hide all the charmm warnings created by PDB readings.
Those warnings will go away anyway with the next update of the CHARMM support.
Ben
--
ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle