Hi Ben We are running redhat5 and have also tried redhat6 and fedora 20. It seems that the things that are missing change with each OS. Fedora20 was best. Redhat5 was missing idock and emagefit (among other things) and redhat6 was still missing idock. Is it because they RPM senses whether the OS will be able to handle each binary and decides whether or not to install it on that basis? We tried installing the RPM but also building from source.
I think the other problem, relating to the missing IMP module, is due to conflicts with python versions - that is, we have several pythons on the system and the IMP modules were being built into a python that was not the default one that you get from the command line...
Cheers Joel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Professor Joel Mackay | NHMRC Senior Research Fellow School of Molecular Bioscience
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY Rm 674, Building G08 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006 | Australia T +61 2 9351 3906 | F +61 2 9351 5858 E joel.mackay@sydney.edu.au | W www.mmb.usyd.edu.au/mackay/
On 11/25/14 10:20 PM, Joel Mackay wrote: > It seems that the things that are missing change with each OS. Fedora20 > was best. Redhat5 was missing idock and emagefit (among other things) > and redhat6 was still missing idock.
Right, this is because RHEL doesn't ship with all of the necessary prerequisites for idock and emagefit - for example, OpenCV. Fedora does. If you want them on RHEL, you'll need to get those dependencies and build from source.
> I think the other problem, relating to the missing IMP module, is due to > conflicts with python versions
The binary package uses Python 2.6 from EPEL on RHEL5. So if you have other Pythons in your path, you may want to explicitly run IMP stuff with /usr/bin/python26 (or whichever other Python you compiled IMP with).
Ben
participants (2)
-
Ben Webb -
Joel Mackay