Thanks for your reply. I have now incoprated your change into my new script. I have also made one change to the energy function.
for i in [s,s1]:
Will this new change that I made cause the modeller to take into account the affect one reside have on to another if they are neighbors?
> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:38:17 -0800
> From: email@example.com
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> CC: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [modeller_usage] mutant two ore more residues
> On 12/01/2010 05:05 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
> > I have made some modification to the mutant script at the modeller wiki.
> > The change may be seen as patch to the original file. I I whised to
> > change residue 1M and 3P to 1T and E3 in 1B72 is this the way to go. Ca
> > s.mutant be used to select two residues?
> Sure, you can mutate as many residues as you want. You just need to
> think about whether the mutated residues interact with each other at
> all, since you may want to adjust the optimization. For example, your
> current script optimizes the first mutated residue, and then the second
> mutated residue. Instead, you *might* want to optimize both residues
> simultaneously. You could do that by replacing:
> optimize(s, sched)
> optimize(s1, sched)
> optimize(s | s1, sched)
> (selections are sets, so "s | s1" returns a new selection that is the
> union of the two selections, i.e. it contains atoms that are in s or s1.)
> A similar consideration may apply to your energy() calls.
> Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
> firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.salilab.org/modeller/
> Modeller mail list: http://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/modeller_usage
> modeller_usage mailing list