modeller as an optimizer, not as a modeller??
hellow, i wish to know whether modeller can be used as a general optimization tool. I have a structure of my protein... also know its binding site to another protein (its a protein-protein complex). i just want to apply simulated annealing to the binding site of my model, to find the best binding conformation... can modeller do that for me??
regarding the same, please apprise me of some details...
firstly, do i need to use the restraints generated by modeller... if yes, which ones??
secondly, what new restraints, if at all, should be applied(as a part of special restraints).
thirdly,is it necessary to use homology basis, the alignment, templates, and homology derived restraints...??
if anyone could give me a sample top script as to how the problem can be tackled, it would be a great help... moreover, any other nuances/suggestions in the approach would be appreciated...
thanks very much,
sincerely, himanshu
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 03:00:34PM +0530, Himanshu Grover wrote: > i wish to know whether modeller can be used as a general optimization > tool. I have a structure of my protein... also know its binding site to > another protein (its a protein-protein complex). i just want to apply > simulated annealing to the binding site of my model, to find the best > binding conformation... can modeller do that for me??
Sure, you can do that - see question 12 in the FAQ: http://salilab.org/modeller/FAQ.html#12
> firstly, do i need to use the restraints generated by modeller... if yes, > which ones??
You can use whichever restraints you choose. You can add your own restraints, or override the default restraints with your own restraints file if you like - this is also in the FAQ.
> secondly, what new restraints, if at all, should be applied(as a part of > special restraints).
That depends on whether your template gives you enough information to generate all the restraints you need - it depends on your system.
> thirdly,is it necessary to use homology basis, the alignment, templates, > and homology derived restraints...??
It's not necessary to use homology-derived restraints; Modeller can use the CHARMM 22 force field and do standard MD if you like (although if you want to go down this road, you're probably better off using a dedicated MD package like CHARMM or GROMOS, and bear in mind that with MM force fields, such 'refinement' without template information is likely to lead to a worse structure). If you have a template, you probably want to use it.
Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
participants (2)
-
Himanshu Grover
-
Modeller Caretaker