Is my model a good one based on these values?
>> Summary of successfully produced models: Filename molpdf DOPE score GA341 score ---------------------------------------------------------------------- qseq1.B99990001.pdb 42902.98828 -324037.96875 1.00000 qseq1.B99990002.pdb 46528.09375 -324130.28125 1.00000 qseq1.B99990003.pdb 48212.83203 -322118.65625 1.00000 qseq1.B99990004.pdb 46319.42969 -321580.65625 1.00000 qseq1.B99990005.pdb 46323.31250 -323706.06250 1.00000
On 3/3/15 10:37 PM, Arijit Ghosh wrote: > >> Summary of successfully produced models: > Filename molpdf DOPE score GA341 score > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
molpdf and DOPE are both "energy" scores, so don't tell you if your model is "good" - you can only really use them to rank models. A GA341 score of 1.0 does suggest a good model, but a better score to use these days is normalized DOPE.
Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
Sorry I did not get you. How do I get a normalized DOPE score? Forgive me if I asked a very rookie question, I am new to modeller.
Best, Arijit
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Modeller Caretaker < modeller-care@salilab.org> wrote:
> On 3/3/15 10:37 PM, Arijit Ghosh wrote: > >> >> Summary of successfully produced models: >> Filename molpdf DOPE score GA341 score >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > molpdf and DOPE are both "energy" scores, so don't tell you if your model > is "good" - you can only really use them to rank models. A GA341 score of > 1.0 does suggest a good model, but a better score to use these days is > normalized DOPE. > > Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker > -- > modeller-care@salilab.org http://www.salilab.org/modeller/ > Modeller mail list: http://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/modeller_usage >
participants (2)
-
Arijit Ghosh -
Modeller Caretaker