Global DOPE vs. local profile
Hi, Ben. Thank you for answering my previous question. I have recalculate it (with smoothing set to 0 and normalize=false) and it indeeds almost matches the global score value with only a few units off.
My other question is: what if the profile score for each of the residues get lower (after MD simulation) but the global score actually increases?
How could we compare the two models then? Would you say one is better than the other because of (global DOPE or profile)?
Thank you for your time and answer.
Best wishes,
--------------------------------- Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
hori koshii wrote: > My other question is: what if the profile score for each of the residues > get lower (after MD simulation) but the global score actually increases? > > How could we compare the two models then? Would you say one is better > than the other because of (global DOPE or profile)?
You could perhaps argue that the structure of that part of the protein with a lowered DOPE score has improved, at the expense of some other part of the protein. But DOPE was designed and benchmarked primarily to score proteins, not individual residues, so I'd say the more reliable indicator is the global DOPE score.
Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
participants (2)
-
hori koshii -
Modeller Caretaker