Yeah, being able to quickly determine how things compared with past days would be really nice.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Barak Raveh barak.raveh@gmail.com wrote:
> changing name to "results" might not be a bad solution :) As long as we > get an indication about completely new failures that's good (I would > actually put those in the subject line) > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Barak Raveh barak.raveh@gmail.comwrote: >> >>> Number of failed tests sounds like a great idea to me. Still, it is >>> problematic that we get a "failure" notice every morning when all we have >>> are known issues, it means that nobody cares what's in those tests anymore. >> >> I would simply change the email title to "results" :-) Given that there >> are a bunch of separate modules in there maintained by different people, I >> don't think it makes sense to aim for a state where a single bit provides >> useful information about all of IMP. >> >> > > > > -- > Barak >