There are a ton of git/svn comparisons out there already (google "git vs svn"). I'm not sure we need to produce a new one. But perhaps link to an existing one.
On Apr 17, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Riccardo Pellarin pellarin.riccardo@gmail.com wrote:
> In the wiki it would be nice to have a chart with git and svn-equivalent commands (when applies) > https://github.com/salilab/imp/wiki > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Yannick SPILL yannick@salilab.org wrote: > > For those who didn't follow all of it, have a look at this picture > http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ > > > - if you are making a large change that, for example, touches a bunch of files or will not necessarily be finished before you would like to work on something else IMP related, use a git flow feature branch > - if you are making a change that you would like to share with other people before it is committed into develop (eg to get them to check it doesn't break anything, or to test it as you are developing it), use an imp-flow feature branch. > what is imp-flow vs git-flow? is this a typo? > > -if you are developing a new module or other large body of related code, create a new module in another repository and develop it against the release version of IMP > Why not the develop branch? It could be expected that the new module will be available for the next release, and it doesn't make sense to treat it as a hotfix either! > > Using a branch (feature or hotfix) allows changes to be shared and inspected more easily. I'll update the wiki with the above ideas. > > > and by wiki, you mean: https://github.com/salilab/imp/wiki > > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev > > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev