Daniel Russel wrote: > I think we need to put some thought towards what ways of using IMP we > want to support. As I see it, there are two usage models to support: > 1) The user installs IMP in some standard location and uses it like any > other library. ... > 2) The user adds a module to IMP (but does not check it in to IMP svn) > and uses the IMP build system and imppy.sh to run things.
(1) is pretty much the standard way "normal" packages work, so I think should be the only one we support. We could possibly provide a simple set of SConscripts for those wanting to link programs or other modules against IMP.
> I think Keren uses IMP by calling imppy.sh from an external project. I > would like to discourage this model
I agree.
Ben