it will probably break the impEM test cases. but if you change them accordingly, i do not object.
f
Ben Webb wrote: > Daniel Russel wrote: > >> I propose we change IMP.vectori and IMP.vectorf to IMP.Ints and >> IMP.Floats to be consistent. Any objections? >> > > Sounds good to me. Anything is better than vectori and vectorf, at any > rate (I suspect Bret used those because they're the example in the SWIG > manual for %template). > > Ben >