I am cool with moving to git too. I played with it a little ever since Daniel's demo. It does come with some "headaches" that are avoided in svn (instead of just committing - first stage, then commit locally, then push). But it will probably be fine with everybody after some getting used to.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Dina Schneidman duhovka@gmail.com wrote:
> I think it is a good idea if we all use the same repository to > eliminate the need to sync svn and git. > I am sure we can all easily learn git basics fast. > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Ben Webb ben@salilab.org wrote: > > On 8/6/12 1:54 PM, Barak Raveh wrote: > >> > >> About git - it's kinda in the twilight zone now, Daniel already has set > >> a git repository that he keeps in sync with the svn every once in a > >> while, but it might take a little while until we leave svn, probably > >> only following the next release? Daniel? Ben? > > > > > > When we last discussed this, the tentative plan was to move to git after > the > > next stable IMP release. If people have strong opinions either way about > > this, now would be the time to say so! (If you have no experience with > git > > but are interested in playing with it, you could try out git-svn, which > > works quite nicely as a 'frontend' to IMP's current SVN repository.) > > > > Ben > > -- > > ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/ > > "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." > > - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IMP-dev mailing list > > IMP-dev@salilab.org > > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev >