Re: [IMP-dev] IMP reorg

Daniel Russel wrote: > I think I am still confused, is the experimental for any restraints > that deal with experimental data or for experimental restraints (i.e. > ones whose functionality is not yet completely nailed down)? If it is > the former, I misunderstood, but it should definitely have its tests > run. If the latter, it seems quite reasonably to run tests on it, but > not have the tests break the build. And it also seems reasonable to > put things there first and then move them elsewhere when they are > better defined and more stable.

It's the latter.

Ben