Regarding Best Selection of model decoy
Respected Sir/Madam
How do i consider the following analysis during the modeler run itself like assess.dope, assess.GA341 etc in model-mult.py etc. 1. Z score as Modeler doesn't reach below 1 in z scores. 2. RMSD to the template structure with just one template considered. 3. GDT-TS scores etc. I have some ideas which i believe Modeler should consider to increase the prediction accuracy. How i can check these out. Do let me know about considering these 3 results in the log file. And to modeler caretaker, i have something to share with you. How to go about that.
Regards Ashish
On 02/13/2010 03:12 AM, Ashish Runthala wrote: > How do i consider the following analysis during the modeler run > itself like assess.dope, assess.GA341 etc in model-mult.py etc. > 1. Z score as Modeler doesn't reach below 1 in z scores.
Normalized DOPE Z scores are typically the most reliable method of model assessment.
> 2. RMSD to the template structure with just one template considered.
This doesn't make a whole lot of sense, since Modeller always builds models that are structurally similar to the template. This will simply give you a score that strongly correlates with the sequence identity.
> 3. GDT-TS scores etc.
Sure, if you have the known (native) structure, one benchmark is to compare the model against the native using the GDT-TS score.
You can add additional assessment methods to automodel by simply writing a Python function and adding that Python function to the assess_methods list in the automodel constructor. For example, the GA341 assessment method simply looks like:
def GA341(atmsel): """Returns the GA341 score of the given model.""" mdl = atmsel.get_model() return ('GA341 score', mdl.assess_ga341())
> And to modeler caretaker, i have something to share with you. How to > go about that.
You can find contact details on our website: http://salilab.org/modeller/contact.html
Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
participants (2)
-
Ashish Runthala
-
Modeller Caretaker