Re: [modeller_usage] Incorrect Number or residues/Starting position
To: "Kevin Galens (RIT Student)" <>
Subject: Re: [modeller_usage] Incorrect Number or residues/Starting position
From: Modeller Caretaker <>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:08:29 -0800
Cc:
Kevin Galens (RIT Student) wrote:
I'm attempting to use modeller to use two templates to model on short
sequence. I'm also creating the alignment file (PIR format) on my own
and I'm having some troubles with one of my sequences. My alignment
file is as follows:
rdpdb___303E> No atoms were read from the specified input PDB file,
since the
starting residue number and/or chain id in MODEL_SEGMENT (or
the alignment file header) was not found;
requested starting position: 1: H
rdabrk__288W> Protein not accepted: 2
check_a_337E> Structure not read in: 2
I'm running version 8v1 on Fedora core 3. The best that I can decipher
is that modeller can't understand the starting position. Or perhaps it
can't find the chain. The pdb file has the same exact sequence (minus
the gaps of course) and chain id H.
It can't find residue number '1' in chain 'H'. This isn't surprising,
because PDB code 1fns has chain H numbered from 215 to 439. You should
fix your alignment file.
Interestingly (or confusingly) I also tried replacing the residue start
and end with the words 'FIRST' and 'LAST' leaving the chain
H, thinking that Modeller could grab the chain without me telling it
where to start and end explicitly. The end of the error file was as
follows:
...
rdabrk__290E> Number of residues in the alignment and pdb files are
different:
225 220
For alignment entry: 2
rdabrk__288W> Protein not accepted: 2
check_a_337E> Structure not read in: 2
Okay, so modeller thinks there are 220 residues in the pdb file? Is it
looking at the right chain? The other chains in that file are length 217
and 195 (which isn't 220). It's looking at the correct file, who knows
what chain it's going for.
There are 220 residues in chain H, since residues 352 through 356 were
not located in the experiment (see the REMARK 465 lines). Since there is
no structural information for these 5 residues, your alignment should
probably have a gap of width 5 at that point.
Incidentally, there is a similar problem with your other structure
(15c8); residues 131, 132, 155, and 158 through 161 are missing.