Re: [modeller_usage] Bad Contacts and Dimeric symmetry
To: nornik <>
Subject: Re: [modeller_usage] Bad Contacts and Dimeric symmetry
From: Modeller Caretaker <>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:46:50 -0700
Cc: "" <>
nornik wrote:
My first issue is about bad contacts. When i produce models and
evaluate them with procheck I always get some bad contacts. I have
checked the procheck output files and noticed that all bad contacts
always have a distance of 2.5 or 2.6 angstroms. Is there any way to
change the minimum distance between atoms (i.e. increasing the
different atom radii), since it seems like modeller and procheck have
different opinions about what a bad contact is?
Bad contacts are usually a consequence of a poor input alignment,
causing conflicts between different classes of restraints. You can
certainly modify the atomic radii (modlib/radii.lib file) but this will
probably not fix your underlying problem.
My second issue is about dimeric symmetry. I produced a model of a
dimer using the automodel class and got some nice models. Then i wanted
to produce the dimers with symmetry restraints and got many angles in
disallowed regions, many bad contacts and very low G-factors. This seems
very strange since the only difference between my two runs was that i
requested symmetry in my second run. Why do my symmetrical dimers become
so bad?
Was the first (unconstrained) dimer model roughly symmetric? If it
wasn't, then trying to force it to be symmetric by imposing a symmetry
restraint probably won't help - there are probably some conflicting
restraints (particularly if your template is a non-symmetric dimer,
since the distance restraints from the template will conflict with your
symmetry). You may need to remove some of these restraints, either
manually or by modifying your alignment.
I doubt this is the cause of your problem, but symmetry restraints will
only work if these two chains are in fact the same sequence, since they
work by constraining all internal distances between the two selections.
You can also speed things up a lot by only constraining the backbone or
C-alpha atoms to be symmetric, since that will dramatically cut down on
the number of internal distances, e.g. with