[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Loop Modeling
Dear Modellers,
I have been running through the examples in the Fiser and Sali paper
concerning the modeling of the loop in cpCN-V (circularly permuted
cyanovirin). I used the given scripts, modifying it to allow the
modeling of different linker lengths, from 6 to 12 residues, as
suggested in the paper. 200 final models of each linker were obtained,
the model with the lowest energy score (objective function) being
selected in each case. This gave the following table of results:
Length (aa) Residues Objective Function Model # File Name
6 49-54 21.6408
119 cpCN-V.BL06
7 48-54
12.1955 49 cpCN-V.BL07
7 49-55 33.0729
118 cpCN-V.BL07a
8 47-54 7.5401
153 cpCN-V.BL08
8 49-56 35.8842
152 cpCN-V.BL08a
8 48-55 31.0163
117 cpCN-V.BL08b
9 46-54
12.1449 95 cpCN-V.BL09
9 49-57
24.4132 39 cpCN-V.BL09a
9 47-55 29.1883
145 cpCN-V.BL09b
9 48-56 27.4328
115 cpCN-V.BL09c
10 46-55 28.5179
184 cpCN-V.BL10
10 47-56 29.004
199 cpCN-V.BL10a
10 48-57 31.8589
25 cpCN-V.BL10b
11 46-56 18.1581
109 cpCN-V.BL11
11 47-57 22.4939
189 cpCN-V.BL11a
12 46-57 27.0164
198 cpCN-V.BL12
My question is, can I take the 'best' loop model as being that with the
lowest objective function (i.e. model cpCN-V.BL08, objective function
7.5401).
I did wonder how my results compared with those obtained by Fiser and
Sali, but I have been unable to find this.
Cheers,
Alex Brown
PS. I'm running Modeller v6.2 on Mac OS X (Darwin). Each modeling run
(200 loop models) took 6-10 hours !!!!