[modeller_usage] Re: Regarding manual protein sequence alignment
To:
Subject: [modeller_usage] Re: Regarding manual protein sequence alignment
From: Michal Kurowski <>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:58:03 +0100
Mail-followup-to: Michal Kurowski <>,
Disclaimer: I'm a co-author of one of meta-server methods.
Karsten Suhre [] wrote:
>
> before attacking an alignment by hand, I would try some more sophisticated
> alignment programs, i.e. those that can include structure information.
This is true and tcoffee is highly recommended but please do not
recommend a single threading-based methods on their own to newcomers.
No single structure prediction method is able to match performance of
combined approach which includes following steps:
- target protein class discovery
- prediction of primary (family membership) and secondary structure
(including disordered regions)
- structure prediction itself
- approaching the consensus
I highly appreciate Fugue method as such but what was outlined above
should be kept in mind.
Of course in a simple cases a 'naive' structural alignment, for
example produced by tcoffe in a structural mode might be just in case.
Cheers,
--
Michal Kurowski
<>