There was a bug in LowestRefinedPairScore::get_inputs(). A fix will be pushed shortly. Pia, can I add you test to the misc module as a test? Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Daniel Russel drussel@gmail.com wrote:
> I'll take a look. Thanks. > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Pia Unverdorben unverdor@biochem.mpg.dewrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> after some time, I updated IMP. Now the way I set up >> ConnectivityRestraints fails. I combine several particles to a >> pseudo-particle and the connectivity restraint gets a list of this >> pseudo-particles. The problem occurs in the moment, I try to evaluate the >> restraint. >> Attached is an example script, based on the connectivity example. That >> works still fine in an older IMP version, but now it gives me an error >> message "_IMP_base.InternalException: Not in input list. Violating object: >> "Model 0". Attribute x of particle "P3" with id 3" even though P3 has a >> x-value. >> What is wrong in my approach? Or what did change in the implementation? >> Is it related to the issue, that in my case particle.show() now only >> displays the name, but no attributes anymore? >> Furthermore, there is a "WARNING You should pass the model to the >> Restraint constructor. Constructing ConnectivityRestraint %1%", directly >> when I call IMP.core.ConnectivityRetraint. Is there a possibility to add >> the Model already at this point, which is not described in the >> documentation? I use set_model in the next line... >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Pia >> >> >> >> >> Pia Unverdorben (Dipl. Math.) >> Max-Planck Institut für Biochemie >> Am Klopferspitz 18 >> D-82152 Martinsried >> >> unverdor@biochem.mpg.de >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IMP-users mailing list >> IMP-users@salilab.org >> https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-users >> >> >